<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.labourhome.org/">
<title>Labourhome - Stories by e8voice</title>
<link>http://www.labourhome.org/</link>
<description>Back to the roots...</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2007 - LabourHome.org</dc:rights>
<dc:date>Thu Aug 28 10:57:10 2008</dc:date>
<dc:publisher>Labourhome</dc:publisher>
<dc:creator>Labourhome</dc:creator>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/4/9/155334/2227" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.labourhome.org/favicon.ico" />
<textinput rdf:resource="http://www.labourhome.org/search/" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.labourhome.org/favicon.ico">
<title>Labourhome</title>
<url>http://www.labourhome.org/favicon.ico</url>
<link>http://www.labourhome.org/</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/4/9/155334/2227">
<title>[Blogs] A winning strategy for Ken?</title>
<link>http://www.labourhome.org/story/2008/4/9/155334/2227</link>
<description><![CDATA[ Perhaps in order to demonstrate that decision-making by a committee of 100 experts doesn't work, Politicshome has suggested a 'winning strategy' for Ken Livingstone that is unlikely to work.<br> <p>According to a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.politicshome.com/Blogs.aspx?Blog=372#372">PoliticsHome panel of experts</a> Ken Livingstone should project himself as a 'competent CEO', portray Boris Johnson as a clown, give jobs to the Lib Dem and Green candidates and avoid Gordon Brown and Labour.<br><br>Maybe the PoliticsHome strategy by a committee of 100 experts methodology is flawed. But I don't think that's a winning strategy at all.<br><br>Ken's personality (and, let's be honest, his flaws) means that any attempt to project himself as boring, straight down the line corporate boss will unravel fairly quickly. If he is drawing attention to Boris Johnson's colourful personality at the same time it will only make his new persona seem even stranger and could well benefit his opponent. By giving jobs to the Green and Lib Dem candidates he would look weak, desperate, and like he was running out of ideas. Brian Paddick has already said that he wouldn't take up a job offer from Ken anyway. And who exactly do the experts think is knocking the doors day after day for Ken if it's not Labour activists?</p><p>I've put some thoughts down on what could be a winning strategy at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.e8voice.blogspot.com">http://www.e8voice.blogspot.com</a> but would be interested in the views of others.</p><p>Ken can win. Ken should win. But he's not going to do it just by playing safe. That would play right into Boris Johnson's hands.<br></p> <BR><A 
href='http://messagespace.advertserve.com/advertpro/servlet/click/zone?zid=72&pid=2&lookup=true&position=1' 
target='_top'><IMG 
src='http://messagespace.advertserve.com/advertpro/servlet/view/banner/image/zone?zid=72&pid=2&position=1' 
hspace='0' vspace='0' border='0' alt='Advertise on this site with MessageSpace'></A> ]]></description>
<dc:date>2008-04-09T15:53:34-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<textinput rdf:about="http://www.labourhome.org/search/">
<title>Search Labourhome</title>
<description></description>
<name>string</name>
<link>http://www.labourhome.org/search/</link>
</textinput>

</rdf:RDF>